On May 23, the Associated Press released part 5 of a series examining health disparities experienced by Black Americans. This piece, which is incredibly thorough and well-written, addresses racially-based disparities in Alzheimer's incidence, racially-based disparities in medical treatment; the need for patient advocacy; and the economic and emotional challenges of caregiving.
The story subjects live in Virginia, a state that has no Multisector Plan for Aging, but has begun its 4-year journey to develop an OAA-mandated State Plan for Aging Services. In that plan, Goal 3: Promote access to aging and community services for older Virginians with the greatest economic and social needs, and Goal 5: Improve access to resources and services that support caregivers, might come in handy for the daughter profiled in the article.
But it had me, a person easily confused by bureaucratic language, wondering how we might better define the difference between what states have to do regarding State Plans for Aging Services, and what they should, perhaps more effectively do, which is to create a Multisector Plan for Aging.
Could you, @Amy Herr, define the differences for us?
Why, if states are creating State Plans, could they or should they not switch to Multisector Plans instead?
We'd love some answers!
------------------------------
Alison Biggar
Senior Editor
American Society on Aging
San Francisco CA
------------------------------